What I Have Come to Notice

Do not read this if you are a Rainbow fascist and intent on insulting me, as I will insult you back.

 
I would not want my child to go to a school where being gay is normalised.
Homosexuality is not normal. The male must ‘fit’ into the female in the correct place that it was designed for. Anything else is forbidden. There is a karmic consequence which will be experienced at a later date; especially male to male and anal sex of any gender.
Once homosexuality is normalised, (as it will be and is being) values will degenerate from normalising homosexuality, to sex with animals (bestiality), bastardisation and other 50 shades of kink and debauchery. It is a fact because it is already happening.
I have not personally come across any hate from the NO voters, but I have had horrible and untrue things said to me personally. Since I first wrote this I was shown a vile post, so vile I can’t repeat it here. It has upset me that anyone would equate what I write with vile stuff like that. But I now have a sneaking feeling that it was done by the person who sent it to me. Mostly I just post on Twitter: I’m Voting NO. This is not directed at any specific person or any gender. The only time I post more is when people ask me why. And then I tell them why as I am doing here; still nothing personal coming from me. All of a sudden these strangers know all about me, they know what I know, they know what I don’t know and they know what I think. This is crazy stuff for a rational and clear thinking person to have to reply to or ignore.
Same Sex advocates mostly concentrate on love. They say that Love is Love. This of course is true. I love my daughter, but I don’t have sex with her. Once love is romantically linked to sex it isn’t just love. If two men love each other and are not homosexual, then all is good. I have no problems with love.
50 years ago homosexuality was illegal in most places. This was a bad law and should never have existed. As long as sex was between two consenting adult couples, it should have only been the business of the couple and their karma that was at stake. Now in a very short time the pendulum is swinging the opposite way, equally wrong, from one extreme to the other.
The swing has arisen since the proliferation of the Internet and the ease of watching porn. I have seen the most horrific things on the Internet that I would never have seen in life. The availability of such degrading sexual viewing has normalised degrading behaviour. I clicked on a link on a website that I was a member of. The profile was of a very good looking man. I clicked on Broadcast just so I could see him in person, but it was two lesbians and a German Shepard dog. The butch looking woman had a whip and she whipped the other more feminine woman who then lent over a couch and the dog came to her from behind and copulated with her. I was shocked and I reported it. The profile went down for a day. The very next day it was back up with the same profile photo. So the site virtually has condoned the behaviour.
Personally I think marriage is rather stupid and unnecessary. Why should we need a certificate to say that we can legally live with someone and have babies with them? I follow Natural Law. Marriage is not part of Natural Law. Marriage is a human invention so that children may know their fathers. Of course many people choose not to marry and have children. This used to be known as ‘out of wedlock’. Taking children from unmarried mothers was equally wrong and thank Goodness that has died a natural death.
People have called me homophobic, but it hardly applies to me. I don’t treat gays any differently than anyone else. When I bought a new car, I gave my old registered car to a gay couple. But if I was invited to a gay wedding, I would not go. I don’t despise gays, though I do not condone their behaviour and therefore will not advocate on their behalf. It is not for me to tell them how to live their lives. I like people who are likable and I dislike people who are not regardless of who they are.
We are finally getting a handle on Domestic Violence, partly due to Rosie Batty, after the tragic death of her son. Before she became high profile, domestic violence was a secret affair and hidden from view and not taken seriously by the police. This is one thing going in the right direction and no longer viewed as a natural part of life to be suffered mainly by women. Incest has generally been hidden and children’s lives ruined sometimes for life. My view is that if anything is between consenting adults and done in private, it should not be illegal. They will receive their karma at a later date. But if one is not a consenting adult, child or animal; the perpetrator must be dealt with harshly.
I do disapprove of the way some gays behave. I was walking down a little track at Maroubra beach at the bottom of Bond St where my daughter lives and came across two naked men having sex. They did stop pumping arse when I made eye contact, but I just had to walk past as if I hadn’t noticed.
There are many things that need to be changed and marriage isn’t one of them.
If you are going to criticise, make sure you are logical and correct and that it applies to the blog, not to the way I dress or my age or anything unrelated. If you do feel to insult, just realise that it may go against your cause. People will not respect you. People do respect me that know me.

Advertisements

FUCK vs fuck

Ok, as a Gnostic, people may expect that I never swear. Well I do and when I do, I do without any guilt. From a Gnostic’s point of view, there is no such thing as a bad word.

 

Words become bad by the way they are used and then it isn’t just one word that is bad, it’s the whole sentence.

 

So I might say, “Oh fuck! I’ve just been stung by a bull ant!” To bleep this word out on TV is plain stupid. Everyone knows the word. My daughters knew it the day they started at primary School. And if they don’t know the meaning, then what is the point of drawing attention to it? This is what I call small ‘f’ fuck. A word can never be bad in itself as it is just a combination of letters. It is no worse than flick, frock or suck. It all depends on what you do with the words that you choose and not the letters. If I write this word…isklttle, would this offend you? It shouldn’t as it has no specific meaning and neither has small f fuck. It can mean the same as shit another bleeped out word, yet faeces and excrement are not. When a person exclaims “Shit!” they are not thinking of excrement. They are exclaiming a certain anguish, pain, shock or even excitement in some cases. There is nothing bad behind the exclamation.

Everyone silently says the word fuck as the TV bleeps it out. Those that miraculously have never heard the word, Quakers maybe, then they only have to ask someone or go without knowing as usual. I’ve heard fuck heaps of times on daytime radio, always a small f though.

 

Now how do you think an upper case F Fuck would be represented? Everyone should be able to differentiate between the two.

Bogan talk some may call it. “Why don’t you just Fuck off you Fucking dick-head!” Perhaps it would be safer not to televise these sorts of people who talk in this abusive manner. Who wants to listen to that way of talking anyway? Anyone who does want to listen to it on TV or radio, most likely hear it in their own homes anyway. So they would hardly care if it’s bleeped.

 

Then there is the third meaning and guys, most wo-men dislike fuck being used instead of sex. Never tell a wo-men that you want to fuck her. No matter how gorgeous you think you are, very few wo-men want to be fucked. When a bogan says “get fucked!” They are insulting the person they are saying it to. So why would wo-men want to get fucked? Believe me they don’t, unless they have mental problems, or they are Bogans and that’s how they talk.

 

It is difficult to understand the implication behind the bleep or ***’s in this sentence: “You f***ing C**t! Shut your f***ing mouth or I’ll knock your f***ing head off and kick it down the f***ing street!” If this is read by a person who knows the word implied by f***ing, how is putting *** instead of the full word going to change the meaning of the sentence? The wording is aggressive and threatening. If the word Cunt is also **ed, then the entire meaning is missed if the person cannot guess the **ed word. It is debatable that it true meaning is even thought of by the speaker. It has become a swear word, similar to calling a man a dickhead. What is a dickhead? To me it signifies someone you don’t mind calling an idiot. He could have an above average sized penis, or more appropriately, very small. The reader has to know the nick name for penis is Dick. If you already know these things, what’s the problem with hearing or reading it?

 

It always amuses me that whenever you see a group of nude people on TV they blur out the bits, yet everyone in the actual vicinity got full view whether they liked it or not. They could always shut their eyes, I suppose.

Hands up those who wish to keep the bleeps and to always see the ***’s.

 

 

The case for keeping Julia Gillard

The Australian Independent Media Network

“So why am I the last columnist to give them a fighting chance? Well, Julia Gillard has never been given a fair go” (Robert Macklin).

JULIA-GILLARD-QT-300x225

This post has been reproduced with the kind permission of journalist and author, Robert Macklin from his article The case for keeping Julia.

It seems I’m the only columnist left in Australia who thinks Julia Gillard and her excellent government have a reasonable chance of winning the September 14 election.

Call me quixotic if you like, but I just can’t believe that my fellow Australians would toss out a government that has done us such sterling service for an opposition led by Tony Abbott who threatens to undo so much of what we’ve achieved these last five years; and who wants to set us on a path to “austerity” that has done such appalling damage in Europe and the US.

Consider the Government’s achievements:…

View original post 407 more words

Haters want to hate

The Australian Independent Media Network

NDISParliamentIt’s clear Australian voters aren’t rational, but do they have to be so blatantly mindless as well? When I say voters, I’m currently referring in this context to the people recently polled by ReachTEL and whose responses contributed to this headline on News.com:

Voters trust Opposition Leader Tony Abbott most to deliver NDIS, poll reveals

I had to read this a couple of times before I believed what I was seeing. The figures in the article state that 57% of the poll’s respondents trust Tony Abbott to deliver the NDIS, more so than they trust Julia Gillard. Surely, even someone completely rusted onto the Liberal party, even Peta Credlin, even Gina Rinehart, even Rupert Murdoch, even Alan Jones, even Tony Abbott himself must see the inanity in this poll result. The NDIS is Labor’s policy. It was the work of Bill Shorten, and only with Julia Gillard’s support…

View original post 539 more words